Browser font fallback determines the threat. When a page specifies font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif and a string contains Cyrillic а, the browser checks Arial’s glyph tables, finds Cyrillic coverage, and renders it using Arial’s Cyrillic glyphs — which are pixel-identical to the Latin ones. The CSS font stack you ship determines which column of the danger rate table applies to your users. Arial at 40.8% is a different risk profile from Didot at 19.2%.
echo "started."
，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
At some point I realized I could run tests forever. And I had already done that last year, and wrote it up in blog posts (one and two). Doing it again here didn’t seem especially valuable. So I pivoted to a “how to” page. In redesign 3 I decided to show the concepts, then a JavaScript implementation using CPU rendering, and then another implementation using GPU rendering. I made new versions of the diagrams:
The success of the test means project leaders are considering scrapping plans to flood 900 acres (364 hectares) of farmland in Gloucestershire, which was initially proposed to provide a compensating habitat for fish.